Press "Enter" to skip to content

MLMs Break the Internet

If you heard about something that seemed like it might be too good to be true, your first reaction would probably be to Google it. Maybe if you’re really suspicious, you might add “reviews” or “does it work?” to your search. We trust the internet to make available to us all of the best information–and most of the time, it does.

Unfortunately, with products distributed by multi-level-marketing companies, such as Plexus and Lularoe, your go-to Google search gives you bad information. That’s due to a clever trick that these companies use to exploit a common weakness of algorithms used by companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter.

How MLMs Break Google

The internet is made up of millions of pages of content. In order to answer your every question, your favorite search engine has to know about all of that content.

There’s so much content out there that when you ask a question, your search engine can’t show you every possible answer. Instead, it has to examine all of that content to decide what it thinks are the best answers. “Good” content rises to the top of the search results, and “bad” content gets demoted to the end of the list, where you likely never see it (most people only look at the first few results). To decide what’s good and what isn’t, your search engine scans everything for clues, including how frequently different kinds of content appear. The internet relies on wisdom in numbers, just like we do.

This ranking system is how multi-level-marketing companies control their online presence. These companies encourage a lot of people to create a lot of positive content (videos, tweets, reviews, blogs, websites, and more) all over the internet to promote their products. The huge volume of unique results tricks website search engines, feeds, and trends into thinking that this positive content is the best content about these companies and products. Critical and unbiased stuff gets drowned out.

MLM companies know that If you search for a bad review of something online and you can’t find one, you will probably conclude that the product is great, not that you just can’t find the bad reviews. If you search for a product online and you can’t find it, you probably will conclude the product doesn’t exist at all.


The implications of this are a little bit mind-blowing. The algorithms behind Google’s search results, Facebook’s feed, Twitter’s trends, and are so powerful that they can change how we think about what’s important or even what exists.

But isn’t that spam?

Really, this is a system where companies blanket the internet with a huge amount of biased information about their products. If they were blanketing your inbox, your mailbox, or your windshield with that information, we would call it spam. Does that mean that all of these chirpy blog posts and motivational tweets are spam, too? And if so, why don’t search engines notice and banish it all to the “bad” category, never to be heard from again?

This is where the MCMs’ plan get even more sophisticated. Breaking the internet isn’t just a numbers game. It’s the kind of content that really counts. Search engines are diligently trying not to show you spam and other undesirables, like your classmate’s old Geocities site from 1999. On the other hand, sites are also sniffing out good content that’s important to you.

As far as Google, Facebook, Twitter, and their ilk are concerned, MCM content isn’t spam. Spam is generated by computers, sent out to huge lists of unsuspecting people, and is really obviously scammy to humans. Spam is not created by a bunch of individuals creating unique blog posts and videos talking about their experiences, and sharing with their personal friends and family. But since MCMs encourage individuals to do the company’s promotion for them, it’s individuals who are generating all of the blog posts, tweets, videos, testimonials, and motivational updates. Those are your friends or your family members posting, so all of that content must be “good” content. At least, that’s what the time-tested logic of the internet would say.

The problem is that the internet’s ideas about good and bad content haven’t caught up to the age of social media. These posts may seem important, but in reality, they are a brand-new kind of spam. Like the chain letters of your childhood, this spam is made by social networks, not computers. Multi-level-marketing leaders actually even train their teams to avoid detection (read: seem less like a computer, more like a human) by teaching things like “don’t copy and paste posts” and “get creative, be unique.” Part of the reason these companies have flourished is because their model is strongest where the internet is the weakest: algorithms are not as creative as people are. And unlike clicking “report spam” on an email, you’re not nearly as likely to block your friend or loved one.

So, posts by the people who are selling the products or recruiting for the company seem important because to the algorithms — they look important. This means these posts show up at the top whenever you search YouTube, Google, and Twitter. If you look for reviews–even if you search for bad reviews– all you’ll find is content that the company, or its representatives, has personally crafted. The company has total control over what shows up online.

The problem just gets worse

The people creating this content are good people, doing their best to sell products and recruit new team members, caught up in something larger. The problem snowballs out of control as new people rely on the flawed information online for protection, only to get entangled themselves.

Regular tools for researching MLM products and companies just don’t work.

Suppose Jamie is thinking about joining a team selling an MLM vitamin product. Even if she is smart, she knows how to research, and she cares about doing her due diligence, she can’t. The tool Jamie trusts to do that research–the Internet–is effectively presenting the company’s advertising materials as the factual truth. Extensive research leads Jamie to the very biased conclusions presented by the masses of people already involved with the company. So Jamie joins the company, and creates even more content. If Jamie joins a particularly bad MLM she might end up losing a lot of her money and time, and involving family and friends along the way.

Learn more

Check out these links to learn more and leave questions in the comments!

How does Google search work, more

No. 1 Position in Google Gets 33% of Search Traffic

Info about Facebook’s feed algorithm, F8: How News Feed Works

NYTimes: Facebook’s Bias Is Built-In


  1. Shoshana Gleit Shoshana Gleit March 17, 2017

    I find it so frustrating that the internet yields such positive results when researching MLM scams. These companies should be illegal. I’m a stay at home mom and I know about a dozen women that have gotten sucked into selling this crap. I’m on a mission to talk them out of it. I keep pointing people to John Oliver’s awesome clip about them.
    It annoys me so much I’m thinking of starting a blog about it.

  2. toolbelt toolbelt November 13, 2019

    MLMs brag that they don’t advertise because word of mouth is more effective. The truth is, social media is just another form of mass media, so while you may not see ads on tv like traditional marketers, MLMs advertise by manipulating social media. They also pay fees to magazines to publish opinion pieces or to tv networks to run paid presentations. And let’s not forget the endorsement fees, or ”
    charitable” donations made strictly for public relations purposes. One could even suggest that lobbying fees paid to Washington officials are also a form of sales promotion because without a favorable political environment, most MLMs wouldn’t last a year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mission News Theme by Compete Themes.